Pattern · seen in 1 breakdown across 1 company
Hot-Data-First Migration
Definition
Order a live data migration by access recency and frequency rather than by key range or table order: replicate the hot set — recently created, updated, and read entities — ahead of the archive, so the strained source system sheds its serving load as early as possible and the destination becomes useful long before the migration completes. The mechanism is typically a live change/access feed capturing the hot set in real time, plus a background scan walking the remainder most-recent-first under backpressure, advancing only when the live feed's queue runs empty so the archive never competes with the present.
The pattern's defining honesty is that capability arrives per access pattern, not per percentage: point lookups on hot entities serve from the destination almost immediately, while any query that must see the full population — listings, aggregates, anything not keyed by ID — structurally waits for the scan to finish. Migration progress dashboards measured in rows misstate this; the real milestones are 'which query shapes are now servable.' Boundary against uniform backfills (key-ordered or table-ordered): those optimize for scan throughput and completeness accounting, and relieve the source only at the end; hot-first optimizes for load relief and early utility, and pays with a longer, throttled tail.
When it applies
Tradeoffs
The same move, 1 ways
Every row is a production system that bet on this pattern — the note says how, in that system's own terms.
Problems this pattern answers
The walls where its breakdowns live — each opens the cross-company comparison.